So let’s try to get this straight; the Red Cross and others think that it is wrong to pursue the Taliban when they use innocent women and children as human shields. Where would such a stance lead us to other than embolden such cowards to make more attacks and then hide behind the skirts of those they seek to oppress with their form of Islamic Extremism.

We have to crush these maniacs, there is pain in all wars but we cannot turn a blind eye while the enemy encroaches relentlessly destroying the freedoms bought with the blood, sweat and tears which our forefathers shed.

Posted By :Mike

Report This

Ali, then pakistan must compensate everyone killed by people trained and terrorists born there, Afghanistan the same oh and how about everyone killed by the evil trade in heroin comming from there about 80% of all in the world, how about compensation from Iran for all the road side bombs they supplied to insurgents in Iraq, how about Pakistan compensates the cricketers their people tried to murder, 9/11 Bali Madrid, where’s their compensation!!!

Posted By :SYLAR

Report This

The US uses air power to minimise it’s own losses. Afghan farmer equates to no money, equates to no value, in American eyes. Collateral damage, as long as no American is killed, is acceptable to a morally bankrupt military. Psychotic fear of the then USSR, led to the US arming a group of religious nutters, an act which has come back to bite them. Lack of good statesmanship, a cold war neurosis and, (as stated by every US president, including Obama), “America First”, have given the USA a “justification” for the use of terror tactics to try to isolate the Taliban from the general populous. History has proved it can’t work on it’s own. The Taliban may use human shields, but it will work for them. World opinion turned against the Israelis when Hammas used the same tactic.

Posted By :Malc

Report This